Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite(n): 239, Zeilen: 101-107 |
Original: Seite(n): 902f., Zeilen: 119, 101-104 |
|
---|---|---|
[Fn 683] Ebenda, S. 111 f. [Fn 684] Ebenda, S. 113. [Fn 685] Vgl. etwa Art. I § 7 par. 2; Art. II § 1 par. 3 ("immediately"); Art. II § 2 par. 3. [Fn 686] Vgl. dazu Congressional Research Center, Analysis and Interpretation. Annotations of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, 1992 Edition: Cases Decided to June 29, 1992, Senate Document No. 103–6 and 1998 Supplement: Cases Decided to June 26, 1998, Senate Document No. 106–8, S. 904. |
[Fn 36] Id., 111-112. [Fn 37] Id., 113. [Fn 38] Id., 113-116. [Fn 39] Id., 103-106. The OLC also referenced previous debates in Congress in which Members had assumed this proposal and the others remained viable. Ibid. |
Fragmentsichter: Schuju (Sichtungsergebnis: Gut) |
4.229
Seiten